With the 2026 summer transfer window now open, though with the World Cup in full swing I would start to expect some movement in and out of Elland Road in the coming weeks.
Harry Wilson has already signed and, on a free transfer while, Pascal Struijk has left to join Brighton in a deal that nets around £18 million plus add-ons that could take the fee to £20 million. Of course, Illan Meslier also left when his contract expired at the end of the season.
BREAKING: Leeds United have agreed a deal to sign Harry Wilson on a free transfer 🔁 pic.twitter.com/hVg8sC2dQc
— Sky Sports Premier League (@SkySportsPL) June 24, 2026
One thing that I think many fans are curious about is, not only who we are going to sign but also, how much we can spend without violating any financial regulations.
There are also a couple of changes that are in play as well for this season with the SCR (Squad Cost Ratio) replacing the PSR (Profit Sustainability Rules) for the start of the 2026/27 season and there are subtle differences.
Whereas with PSR, a club could factor in losses up to three years, the SCR only allows clubs to spend 85 percent of its revenue for the last financial year, which includes television rights.
As such, I’m led to believe, that means we have roughly about the same as what we had to spend last summer; £90 million or thereabouts, plus about £7.5 million for league finish and our FA Cup run and whatever can be raised through player sales.
Arguably what can work in a club’s favour is the amortisation loophole when it comes to transfers, allowing clubs to pay the fee across the length of a player’s contract, which helps a transfer budget go further.
For example, if a player costs us £40 million and he signs a five year contract, it means that we can pay £8 million per year until his contract expires or he leaves.
While, like most seasons, we continue to be linked with numerous names, I think the most important thing is that we bring in the right players that can increase our positioning and take us to the next level.
There are some rumours that are just downright fantastical; it’s good to see the level of our ambition, but I think we’re at least a couple of years away from being able to attract superstar names and getting back to the club we once were. With that in mind, I’ve done a bit of a deep-dive into what the likeliest scenario is for us in the transfer window, with key positions identified for improvement.
The Left-Sided Vacuum: Why Ladislav Krejci Fits The Post-Struijk Blueprint
I was a bit sad to see Struijk go; mainly because our back three seemed settled and since December, we have more or less, looked solid in defence. Over the last three seasons, since we were relegated, I think he has improved a lot and compared to our last stint in the Premier League, where he was part of a leaky defence, Struijk appears to have matured a lot.
The frustrating part is, now replacing him with someone who is, if not better, then as good and then trying to bed them in. With the system that we play as well, on-field relationships are key, so we need someone who can come in and hit the ground running.
Ladislav Krejci is one player who we have been linked with recently and, there are suggestions that we even met with his representatives when we beat Wolves (where he spent last season on loan from parent club Girona) at Elland Road in April.
The Czech Republic captain has starred at the World Cup and was even an important fixture for the West Midlands outfit last term, despite the club being relegated. Despite this, I think he certainly fits the type of profile we’re looking for; a left-sided, ball-playing centre-back who also stands at 6’3″, perfectly suiting our transition to being a more physical side under Daniel Farke, this time around in the top-flight.
He’s also had a good World Cup, scoring the opening goal against South Korea in the group stage before his side slumped to a 2-1 defeat. Having been eliminated, Krejci, following a couple of weeks holiday could be a good proposition especially if we have already previously spoken.
Although he may not be a ‘name’ that sparks major excitement, the fact is that he has Premier League experience, is physically dominant, can play with the ball at his feet and is press resistant with his passing; a major identifier of the way Farke likes his defenders to be, allowing for effective build-up play from deep and line-breaking passing.
Around better quality players, such as Ethan Ampadu, just in front, I think he could slide seamlessly into our backline and forge a relationship with the likes’ of Jaka Bijol and Joe Rodon.
At 27, he is also the ideal age with enough experience behind him to make an impact. However, he is contracted at Girona until 2030, so I think his price could be a sticking point. Paying any more than £30 million would probably be foolish and no more than a four-year contract should be offered, especially taking into account age and amortisation of transfer fee. At this price, you’d be talking £7.5 million per year, which I think is very fair.
Guarding The Gates: Why Zion Suzuki Solves The Volatile Goalkeeping Conundrum
Like many of you probably are; I’m waiting with bated breath to see what happens with Karl Darlow, following “that lot’s” approach to take him to Old Trafford to be their third goalkeeper.
It depends what he wants. He was brilliant towards the end of last season and I think he more than justifies a new contract at Elland Road; clearly we’re keen for him to stay. Though, regardless if he does or not, I think we’ll still sign a new goalkeeper; it would just depend on the urgency for quality.
Having starred for Japan at the World Cup, Zion Suzuki is reportedly one name that has caught our attention and his club Parma could be keen to cash in though, it seems his price tag would be in the region of £25 million which, to be honest, for a top goalkeeper in his early 20s (23), who could become world class, I don’t think is too bad at all.
For me, he’s been one of the surprise packages at the World Cup this summer – you could say that about a number of players in that Japan side and, I think he would excel at Leeds.
Comfortable with the ball at his feet and around 6’2″, he’s aerially dominant, a great shot-stopper, vocal and commands his penalty area very well, taking the initiative on crosses and imposing himself on opposition attackers. So, yes, I definitely see him being a great signing for us.
There are I think a couple of permutations here. Darlow stays and we go for someone who is cheaper with a lower profile, such as Ukrainian stopper, Dmytro Riznyk, who plies his trade for Shakhtar Donetsk, so has Champions League experience. We have been linked with him and he would likely cost a fee lower than the one quoted for Suzuki.
The other scenario I think is that, Darlow stays, we sign Suzuki but then sell Lucas Perri who I actually do have hope for. Granted, he did look susceptible last season, though he showed some promise.
Despite this though, I think we could probably get about £10 million back for him. With Alex Cairns having signed a contract extension, we would still have three goalkeepers as well.
Insuring The Spine: Why Charles, Ueda And Openda Add Depth And Quality
In what feels like a transfer saga that’s dragged on long enough and having seen our second bid for Shea Charles – reportedly £23 million plus add-ons – rejected, I’m curious what our next move will be.
I do like Charles, though only 23 and with limited experience, I don’t know how much justification there is to offer too much more for someone who I think won’t be anything more than a squad player – at least in the short term.
A bid of £25 million plus add-ons should, I reckon, be reasonable, especially factoring in amortisation; a five-year deal would mean an initial payment of £5 million, which when you think about it, isn’t too bad at all.
While we have been linked with Julian Brandt on a free transfer, I really think this is probably too ambitious. When you take out the Farke factor and an opportunity to play in the Premier League, he has suitors across Europe who are in the Champions League and Europa League, including Atletico Madrid.
I honestly think his partner is the biggest influence though; it seems that she wants to be in a country that has nice weather most of the year and Spain would be the obvious option here.
However, there are a couple of names that we have been linked with who have demonstrated considerable quality in recent seasons. Suzuki’s Japanese teammate; attacker, Ayase Ueda was in clinical scoring form for Feyenoord last season and links to us persist. If Ao Tanaka can convince him a move to Elland Road is a good idea, we may just land a very good striker to add support to both Dominic Calvert-Lewin and Lukas Nmecha.
An ambitious loan-to-buy move for Juventus attacker, Lois Openda could materialise after we were linked with him prior to the start of the World Cup.
His form dipped considerably last season following his move from RB Leipzig where he was prolific, though Farke has proven to be great at helping players rediscover their best (Calvert-Lewin) and this could well be a move that makes sense for all parties.
It seems Nottingham Forest are also linked with a move for him, but I think we have a better chance, if we really want him. At this point, I don’t know whether it is just a rumour or if there is substance to the links.
The Verdict: Transitioning From Premier League Safety To Tactical Ambition
Arguably, this is the most important transfer window to get right. Granted, we needed a progressive one last year; identifying the right type of players to bring in to survive the top-flight, though this one has to be transitional.
| Player | Club (** = On Loan) | Matches (Starts) | Minutes | Goals | Assists | Clean Sheets – Saves – Conceded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ayase Ueda | Feyenoord | 31 (31) | 2,533 | 25 | 1 | NA |
| Ladislav Krejci | Wolves** | 28 (27) | 2356 | 2 | 1 | 3 – N/A – N/A |
| Zion Suzuki | Parma | 20 (20) | 1800 | 0 | 0 | 5 – 66 – 28 |
Last time, we did not get this right. Only really Dan James came in as a signing of note and he was completely the wrong profile for what we needed; ultimately we only just survived; a last gasp strike away at Brentford on the final day of the season, keeping us up.
I think we will have learned our lesson this time around, which appears to have been demonstrated 12 months ago in the transfer window. For me, it doesn’t necessarily matter if we sign ‘names’, but proven quality that can take us up a notch, while still being fiscally responsible.
Of course, if we can be sensible with our outgoings and sell what we don’t need, this could make it one of our best and leanest transfer windows for a long time, setting us up for future success. I reckon Willy Gnonto could be one that is sacrificed, as he doesn’t seem to fit our new system and could probably bring in at least £12.5 million, while Joel Piroe isn’t good enough at this level. I’d be happy to get £8 million, which would be a bargain for a Championship side.
Joe Gelhardt is another who I think could bring in at least £10 million (hopefully with add-ons), while Largie Ramazani appears to be a target for Valencia where he was on loan last season; a £5 million fee seems more than reasonable. With Jack Harrison having a year left on his contract, I’d take £2.5 million for him and possibly a move back to Fiorentina where he was on loan last season could be a good move for all involved.
If we can land the players I’ve mentioned, plus sensible cover at left-back, and recoup a good amount in sales then I think this sets us up for a great season and hopefully an even better transfer window in 12 months time. While most of these players don’t at first glance maybe excite you, they are proven, pragmatic and I think, effective enough to solidify us a top half finish at least, that will allow us then to push on.

